Impose a duty on employers to make a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks to health and safety of employees and others affected by their work.
Reg 2 requires company to have written H & S policy
Reg 3 employers are duty bound by risk assessments. Purpose is to help the employer to determine what measures should be taken to comply with his duties under the relevant statutory provisions. Just visit the Notaries in London for more information.
Reg 5 steps taken to ensure risk assessments carried out and the risks identified are sorted out.
Reg 7 requires the employer to have a competent assistant in applying the provisions of H & S law, i.e. a health and safety official, where dismissal for carrying out any activities in this capacity would render the dismissal automatically unfair.
Reg 10 every employer must give his employees comprehensive and relevant info on the risks to their health and safety identified by the assessment and the preventive and protective measures.
Reg 13 ensures that every employer provides adequate H & S training to their employees.
Breach of the MHSWR can lead to criminal prosecution by the HSE not civil action.
Breach of the other Regs (ie noise, COSHH etc) can lead to civil liability and possible
prosecution by the HSE.
Plan of Attack
1) S.2/3/4 HSWA 1974 (and others if relevant)
2) Regs 3/4/5 MHSWR (and others if relevant)
3) Relevant specific Regs – if breach can give rise to civil liability and/or prosecution by the
4) Common Law – duty of care owed by employer to employee to take reasonable care of his employees’ health and safety. Duty to protect people by having a safe premises, plant and equipment and a safe system of work, inc work related stress.
5) Contractual obligations – employees may also have claims on the basis of breaches of contractual obliges (express or implied) owed by employers to employees. Eg it’s possible for an employee whose complaints of excessive stress are not properly responded to could resign and claim constructive dismissal on the basis that their employer had breached the implied duty of trust and confidence.
Also, courts have been willing to imply similar terms to those existing under common law into the contract of employment. In Walton’s and Morse v Donnington 1997, the EAT held that there was an implied term in the contract that an employer will provide and monitor for employees, so far as reasonably practicable, a working environment which is reasonably suitable for the performance by the employees of their contractual obliges. Here they held the employee had been constructively dismissed when her employers failed to provide her with a smoke free environment, they also held there had been a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence when her employers failed to deal adequately with her problems relating to those who smoked around her.
Liability for breach of statutory duty
Even though HSWA and MHSWR expressly excludes civil actions, the majority of Regs under
the HSWA do not exclude civil actions thus they may be tried to found a civil claim if an
employer fails to comply with the Regs. To be successful in a claim for breach of statutory
duty, an injured employee must show that the breach is actionable in civil court, duty is owed
to C by D, C’s loss is within the mischief of the legislation, D is in breach of the duty and the
breach caused the loss.
Defined as, ‘the liability of an employer to persons injured by the wrongful acts of his
employees, if committed in the course of their employment’. From the Lister case liability
now turns on whether there was a close connection between the employee’s act and the
nature of the duties he was employed to do.